Near-Earth Objects

Late this week, I watched a small asteroid zoom past Earth about 70,000 miles away.

An astronomer in Rome, Italy, working with the Virtual Telescope Project and Arizona’s Tenagra Observatories live-streamed the close encounter.

Because it was so close to our planet, this space rock really zipped across the telescope field, compared to the background stars, but the astronomer was still able to track it – and on a full-moon night, too, when there is a lot of skyglow. That’s amazing!

During the livestream, the asteroid – called 2018 DV1 – looked like a little dot of light, sometimes bright, sometimes faint. The astronomer explained that it has an irregular shape and was tumbling through space, sometimes reflecting more light, sometimes less.

I thought it was adorable. Had it been on a collision course with Earth instead of just flirting with the planet from 70,000 miles away, it would not have seemed so cute.

Here’s what a space rock only about 20 feet bigger than 2018 DV1 did when it hit us in 2013:

This Chelyabinsk meteor was only about the size of a city bus, but it was moving so fast that it had enough kinetic energy to mimic a blast some 30 times more powerful than the Hiroshima atomic bomb. ( W )

It approached with the Sun behind it, so astronomers had no idea this near-Earth object existed until it arrived over the Ural Mountain region.

2018 DV1, on the other hand, was detected on Monday, February 26th, and reached its point of closest approach on March 1 (Pacific time).

There was just a few days’ warning. What would we have done if it had been on a collision course?

A better way to phrase that question is, what will we do when (not if) an asteroid detected, say, on a Monday is due to collide with Earth on Friday?

I know what you’re thinking of right now: the dinosaur-killing asteroid that shut down the Cretaceous period.

Well, unlike the Chelyabinsk meteor, such an impactor would be a global game-changer, not the much more common near-Earth object that astronomers have seen and tracked recently.

However, since I looked up the K/T event at my other blog for an over-long and over-detailed post on cat evolution, let’s check that impact out briefly.

The K/T extinction

Since that post was about cats, my focus was on the most likely mammalian ancestor of carnivorans–Cimolestes, the “Bug Thief.”

One of the unclassified little furballs cowering in the bushes [as T-Rex or even a veggie dinosaur lumbered by] was Cimolestes. It had very sharp cheek teeth that it probably used to devour insects. (Rose)

Perhaps that’s why scientists have given it a name that means “Bug Thief.”

Along with other mammals, as well as tyrannosaurs, Triceratops, and other dinosaurs, the Bug Thief lived in a closed-canopy rainforest on swampy lowlands. The area was near a great inland sea that covered central North America in those days, and it would eventually become the US state Montana. (Prothero, 2006; Rose; Sewall and others; Stoffer; Sweet)

This shallow sea was connected to the Gulf of Mexico (Stoffer and others) where, almost 2,000 miles (3,000 kilometers) south of Cimolestes, the Yucatan platform sat – a big, inviting space target. (From Sweet, Figure 2)

The Bug Thief’s tropical home was rich in “low-energy sedimentary environments” (Sweet), but one day something shook it up badly.

Hundreds of square miles of semisolid mud on the sea floor chaotically mixed together or curled up into rolls and curvy folds. The direction of this movement was always to the south. (Stoffer and others)

Today the deformed seabed is frozen in place as a layer in rock outcrops. Geologists say that the movement here was toward the right (south).

Sediment structures like sand boils and other features that only appear during earthquakes also formed. (Stoffer and others)

And after that there are no more Cretaceous bone fragments or mollusk fossils, despite an intensive five-year field search for some. (Stoffer and others)

Researchers suspect that the cause of all those changes was the bolide impact that excavated the Chicxulub crater around 65 Ma. (Stoffer and others)

A 6- to 9-mile-wide (10-14 kilometers) (Kring) space rock hit Earth there, on the Yucatan peninsula, causing magnitude 11 earthquakes and collapsing the Yucatan platform. (Schulte and others)

Yes, that kind of shaking could have rolled up the seabed near the Bug Thief thousands of miles away, though it’s not certain that impact-generated tsunamis could have traveled so far north. (Stoffer and others)

The details of what happened on Earth after this impact are controversial. (Oppenheimer)

The only unquestioned evidence has already been mentioned: Something big hit Earth around K/T boundary time.

Beyond that basic fact, every discussion about impacts and the K/T extinction, as far as I can tell, is hypothetical only.

And this means there are some wild but still plausible ideas about the K/T extinction.

Because of my forestry background, I like the following description, based on plant evidence, of how the impact affected western North America where Cimolestes lived.

Per the paper by Sweet in the source list at the bottom of this post:

  • The Chicxulub impact melted tons of rock and blasted it all sky-high.
  • Some of the rock turned into molten glass that then rained down on the Bug Thief’s world, igniting the forest canopy.
  • Crown fires raced northward, spreading on winds that reached hundreds of miles an hour (Kring), but the understory of ferns and flowering plants was generally untouched.
  • Dust from the impact rained out of the darkened skies for months until, finally, the Sun broke through again.

Understory plants, released by the death of the former canopy forest, now thrived.

First, pioneer plants came in. Then slowly, over hundreds to thousands of years, the green world restored itself.

Eventually the same dense rainforest once again shaded the swamps. Only a few exotic flowering plants had vanished from it.

But some other living beings were missing, too.

During this extended catastrophe, dominant life forms, including but not limited to Earth’s land and marine nonavian dinosaurs, disappeared.

So did most mammals, including enough marsupials to give the surviving placental mammals dominance in North America. (Prothero, 2006; Rose)

Even with that edge, it wasn’t easy for them. Terrestrial ecosystems collapsed as completely as they had in the Permian extinction, although the global environment fared better this time around. (McGhee and others)

But Cimolestes and some other mammals somehow made it through and started the new age. (Rose)

Yeah. If something that big ever hits Earth again, let’s just hope it comes from the direction of the Sun, like the Chelyabinsk meteor did, so we won’t know about it until it’s here.

Fortunately, recent Earth-approaching asteroids have been much smaller. Too, scientists boosted up their game once they realized, back in the 1980s, that gradualism is only one part of geological history.

Near-Earth objects

According to NASA’s online Center for NEO Studies, another asteroid – 2018 DC – is passing by today.

2018 DC is an “Apollo object,” per its Small-Body Database entry. Such objects are the most common near-Earth object group. (Wikipedia)

If I’m reading the approach information correctly, 2018 DC will get within 22.3 million miles (36 million kilometers) of Earth today – much farther away than the one I watched on the livestream – before heading back out on its orbital path. This looks like the closest approach it has made since the first data entry, from 1926, but after 2018 it stays farther away from us when swinging through the neighborhood.

Another Apollo object, 2018 DS1, is also visiting today, according to the Minor Planet Center, though I can’t make heads or tails out of its data page. It was first observed on February 23, 2018.

There are many thousands of known NEOs out there, with an average of 30 more added each week, per NASA. There are also probably tens of thousands of unrecognized asteroids and comets, not to mention an occasional Tesla Roadster.

NASA, the United Nations, and a variety of national, international, and private groups are on the lookout for NEOs.

Here is a video that NASA made recently for International Asteroid Day:

Asteroid impact defense

Aside from either a K/T-level impactor or the involvement of Hollywood, the planet’s best minds are working out a number of possible defensive measures, summarized in this Wikipedia article.

Here is NASA’s planetary defense FAQ page.

NASA also keeps a list of potential impact risks. This is science in action, which means that it is all very tentative. This automated program has little information to go on, and people have to step in and determine exactly how much risk there is.

Fortunately, most NEOs that show up here are eventually taken off the list. And, from what I’ve read, there appears to be very little risk of an impact from any known object.

The ones that haven’t been seen yet, or can’t be seen (like the Chelyabinsk meteor), well…

A hundred years ago, no one had a clue that disaster can strike so abruptly.

Now, after learning of the K/T asteroid, we laypeople have swung to the other extreme and worry about catastrophe happening at any moment.

That’s possible, of course, but not very likely. Today we have the best knowledge and finest equipment humanity has ever had to meet the challenge, if it arises.

Not only that, we can sit at home and watch a live-stream as adorable little near-misses occasionally pass us on their otherwise lonely journey around the huge and mostly empty Solar System.

Featured image: Proposed fly-eye telescope to watch for near-Earth objects. ESA/A. Baker. CC BY-SA 3.0.


Clemens, W. A., and Kielan-Jaworowska, Z. 1979. Multituberculata, in Mesozoic Mammals: The First Two-Thirds of Mammalian History, ed. J. A. Lillegraven, Z. Kielan-Jaworowska, and W. A. Clemens, 99-149. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Kring, D. A. 2007. The Chicxulub event and its environmental consequences at the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 255:4-21.

McGhee, Jr., G. R.; Sheehan, P. M.; Bottjer, D. J.; and Droser, M. L. 2004. Ecological ranking of Phanerozoic biodiversity crises: ecological and taxonomic severities are decoupled. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 211:289-297.
Oppenheimer, C. 2011. Eruptions That Shook The World. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Prothero, D. R. 2006. After the Dinosaurs: The Age of Mammals. Bloomington and Indianapolis : Indiana University Press.

Rose, K. D. 2006. The Beginning of the Age of Mammals. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Schulte, P.; Alegret, L.; Arenillas, I., and others. 2010. The Chicxulub asteroid impact and mass extinction at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. Science. 327:1214-1218.

Sewall, J. O.; van de Wal, R. S. W.; van der Zwan, K.; van Oosterhout, C.; Dijkstra, H. A.; and Scotese, C. R. 2007. Climate model boundary conditions for four Cretaceous time slices. Climate of the Past. 3:647-657.

Stoffer, P. W. 2003. Geology of Badlands National Park: A preliminary report. United States Geological Survey Open-file Report 03-35.

Stoffer, P. W.; Messina, P.; Chamberlain, Jr., J. A.; and Terry, Jr., D. O. 2001. The Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary interval in Badlands National Park, South Dakota. United States Geological Survey Open-file Report 01-56.

Sweet, A. R. 2001. Plants, a yardstick for measuring the environmental consequences of the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary event. Geoscience Canada. 28(3):127-138.

Wikipedia. Chelyabinsk meteor. Last accessed March 3, 2018.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.